2019.2.10

SLOVO A SMYSL 2019 (16) 32

„Zaujetí kvalitou“ jako protoestetická událost

Vlastimil Zuska

 

 FULL TEXT   

 ABSTRACT (en)

‘Drawing Toward Quality’ as a Proto-Aesthetic Event

Contrary to Ingarden’s meticulous analyses and explanations of many serious aesthetic problems, the initial stages of aesthetic experience or, more aptly, the event that immediately precedes this experience, is rather neglected in his work. This study seeks to fill in the ‘place of indeterminacy’ in Ingarden’s description of the process of aesthetic experience, where the philosopher draws on two notions: drawing toward quality and entry emotion. It uses two main sources. The first is phenomenology, in particular Husserl’s notions of the transition to modalities, the inclination to judge, and Dufrenne’s affective qualities and aesthetic value. As a second point of departure, the study borrows from a wide range of contemporary concepts proper to such fields as cognitive neuroscience, including affective heuristics, affective forecasting, unconscious affect, attitude and attitudinal change, and subtle distinctions in the field of emotions by Damasio: emotion, feeling, and feeling of feelings. Tracing the complex inter-relations among attention, affect, and the affective fixation of attentional focus, the author presents his conclusion concerning the non-aesthetical nature of the first quality in proto-aesthetic event, the event character of this proto-phase of the aesthetic experience, and the initiation of aesthetic experience through self-reflective feeling of feeling, aka entry emotion.

 KEYWORDS (en)

drawing toward quality; feeling of feelings; affective quality; affect heuristics; attention; emergence

 KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA (cs)

zaujetí kvalitou; pociťování pocitů; afektivní kvalita; afektová heuristika; pozornost; emergence

 DOI

https://doi.org/10.14712/23366680.2019.2.10

 REFERENCES

Beardsley, Monroe C.: Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York 1958.

Bennet, Karen — McLaughlin, Brian: Supervenience. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.): Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2011 <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience> [23. 9. 2019].

Bohrer, Karl Heinz: Suddenness: On the Moment of Aesthetic Appearance. Columbia University Press, New York 1994.

Brady, Michael: Emotion, Attention, and the Nature of Value. In: Sabine Roesser — Cain Todd (eds.): Emotion and Value. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2014, s. 52–71.

Clore, Gerald — Robinson, Michael D. — Storbeck, Justin: Seven Sins in the Study of Unconscious Affect. In: Lisa Feldman Barrett — Paula M. Niedenthal — Piotr Winkielman (eds.): Emotion and Consciousness. New York, Guilford Press 2005, s. 384–408.

Cooper, Joel: Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory. Sage, London 2007.

Damasio, Antonio: The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. Vintage, London 2000.

Damasio, Antonio: The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures. Pantheon Books, New York 2018.

Dickie, George: The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude. American Philosophical Quarterly 1, 1964, č. 1, s. 56–65.

Dufrenne, Mikel: The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience, přel. Edward S. Casey. Northwestern University Press, Evanston 1973.

Dufrenne, Mikel: In the Presence of the Sensuous: Essays in Aesthetics, přel. Mark S. Roberts a Dennis Gallagher. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands 1987.

Fenner, David E. W.: The Aesthetic Attitude. Humanities Press, New Jersey 1996.

Ford, Jason — Smith, David Woodruff: Consciousness, Self, and Attention. In: Uriah Krieger — Kenneth Wiliford (eds.): SelfRepresentaional Approaches to Consciousness. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2006, s. 353–378.

Haber, Ralph N. — Hershenson, Maurice: Psychology of Visual Perception. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1980.

Husserl, Edmund: Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic, přel. James S. Churchill a Karl Ameriks. Northwestern University Press, Evanston 1973.

Husserl, Edmund: Ideje k čisté fenomenologii a fenomenologické filosofii I, přel. Alena Rettová a Petr Urban. OIKOYMENH, Praha 2004.

Ingarden, Roman: Time and Modes of Being, přel. Helen R. Michejda. Thomas, Springfield 1964.

Ingarden, Roman: O štruktúre obrazu, přel. Eduard Andráš. Slovenské vydavateľstvo krásnej literatúry, Bratislava 1965.

Ingarden, Roman: O poznávání literárního díla, přel. Hana Jechová. Československý spisovatel, Praha 1967.

Ingarden, Roman: Umělecké dílo literární, přel. Antonín Mokrejš. Odeon, Praha 1989.

Kahneman, Daniel — Frederick, Shane: Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In: Thomas Gilovich — Dale W. Griffin — Daniel Kahneman (eds.): Heuristic and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, New York 2002, s. 49–81.

Kannisto, Toni: In Philosophy, What is the Difference between Emergence and Supervenience? <https://www.quora.com/In-philosophy-what-is-the-difference-between-emergence-and-supervenience> [16. 8. 2019].

Levinson, Jerrold: Aesthetic Supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 22, 1984, č. S1, s. 93–110.

Levinson, Jerrold: Toward an Adequate Conception of Aesthetic Experience. In týž: Aesthetic Pursuits: Essays in Philosophy of Art. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016, s. 28–46.

Mitias, Michael H. (ed.): Aesthetic Quality and Aesthetic Experience. Rodopi, Amsterdam 1988.

Mukařovský, Jan: Pojem celku v teorii umění. In týž: Cestami poetiky a estetiky. Československý spisovatel, Praha 1971, s. 85–98.

Pepper, Stephen C.: Emergence. Journal of Philosophy 23, 1926, s. 241–245.

Slovic, Paul — Finucane, Melissa — Peters, Ellen — MacGregor, Donald G.: The Affect Heuristic. In: Thomas Gilovich — Dale W. Griffin — Daniel Kahneman (eds.): Heuristic and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, New York 2002, s. 49–81.

Uznadze, Dimitri: Psychology of Set, přel. Basil Haigh. Basel, Springer 1995.

Whitehead, Alfred North: Science and the Modern World. The New York American Library 1948.

Zajonc, R. B.: Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences. American Psychologist 35, 1980, s. 151–175.

Úvod > 2019.2.10